I see the 10th Street connector is nearing completion. Another three years to paint the lines and we will be on our way,...

Amendment wouldn't guarantee hunting, fishing freedom


Visitors to a North Carolina park enjoy fishing on July 4 in 2013.


Thursday, July 5, 2018

State fishing license requirements were suspended Wednesday in honor of the Fourth of July. If voters pass a constitutional amendment establishing the right to hunt and fish, could anglers enjoy the same freedom 365 days a year?

In short, probably not.

The text of Senate Bill 677, which places an amendment to the North Carolina Constitution on our ballots this November, starts out with a ringing endorsement of individual liberty.

"The right of the people to hunt, fish and harvest wildlife is a valued part of the State's heritage and shall be forever preserved for the public good," the proposed amendment states. "The people have a right, including the right to use traditional methods, to hunt, fish and harvest wildlife..."

So far, so good. But the amendment continues:

"... subject only to laws enacted by the General Assembly and rules adopted pursuant to authority granted by the General Assembly to (i) promote wildlife conservation and management and (ii) preserve the future of hunting and fishing."

Tar Heels, then, would have the right to hunt and fish — as long as the General Assembly and N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission say it's OK.

We've noted Fishing Freedom Day's sad irony in the past. The one-day reprieve from licensure requirements is meant as a symbolic nod to American freedom, but it only serves to remind us how regulated, subjugated and micromanaged we are the other 364 days of the year.

Take the kids fishing on Independence Day without the state's permission and you're fine. Plan the same outing today and you'll likely pay a fine.

There are reasons the state charges license and permit fees for hunting and fishing, of course, but are they valid ones?

Wildlife conservation is the chief excuse, and it's true that the fees sportsmen and anglers pay help the state manage populations, monitor annual takes and work to prevent extinction and overfishing — all necessary tasks. What's not clear is whether the same result could be achieved voluntarily through membership in private conservation groups also working to preserve the state's stock of seafood and wild game.

Could organizations like the U.S. Sportsmen's Alliance, International Game Fish Association, Trout Unlimited, National Wild Turkey Federation and Ducks Unlimited take care of conservation by signing up members and sponsors instead of requiring people to pay up before they're allowed to hunt and fish?

Voluntary self-regulation is preferable to government using its power to shake people down. It's nearly always just as effective.

Former state Sen. Buck Newton, R-Wilson, initially sponsored a version of the hunting and fishing amendment during his time in the legislature. Many media outlets mocked the bill as red meat, pardon the pun, for conservative voters. We countered that living off the land and feeding oneself is a natural right that ought to be enshrined in the state constitution.

The amendment's latest iteration doesn't seem to accomplish that. It seeks to call something a right but treat it as a privilege — that is, to subject it to all manner of laws, rules and regulations.

Judges used to draw a bright line between constitutional rights and conditional privileges. In the 1943 case Murdock v. Pennsylvania, the U.S. Supreme Court declared that "no state shall convert a liberty into a license and charge a fee therefore."

Murdock jurisprudence has been hollowed out by 70-plus years of conflicting case law, most notably decisions that have found significant limitations on Second Amendment rights to be constitutional.

What's interesting about the hunting and fishing amendment is that, if passed, the language of the newly recognized right would limit itself by making Tar Heels' ability to hunt and fish subject to statute and rule, both of which are subordinate to the state constitution.

The constitution is supposed to limit lawmakers' leeway, not give them unlimited discretion.

Folks can vote for the hunting and fishing amendment if it makes them feel better, but the language it contains makes the "right" to hunt and fish all but meaningless. Perhaps its Republican sponsors are more keen on big government than they're letting on, and the appeal to liberty is little more than a clever marketing trick.

The Wilson Times


Humans of Greenville


Local photographer Joe Pellegrino explores Greenville to create a photographic census of its people.


July 18, 2018

The enduring image of the U.S.-Russia summit in Helsinki on Monday will be that of President Trump standing next to Vladimir Putin and suggesting he found Putin's "powerful" denial at least as persuasive as the U.S. intelligence community's unanimous finding that Russia intervened in the 2016…

APTOPIX Finland Trump Putin Summit

July 17, 2018

Chris Anglin is trying to pull a fast one on North Carolina voters.

Anglin, a Raleigh attorney, is a candidate for the N.C. Supreme Court. Until June 7, he also was a registered Democrat. But when Anglin filed as a candidate at the last moment this month, he did so as a Republican. That means there…

Chris Anglin

July 16, 2018

Thanks to tinkering by North Carolina’s General Assembly, voters this November will face a virtual book of a ballot, chock full of somewhat bewildering constitutional amendments.

Some are rather silly, such as the amendment to establish a constitutional right to hunt and fish ... except when…

N.C. Legislative Building

July 14, 2018

Dogfighting is a felony in all 50 states because the blood sport — usually accompanied by heavy wagering — is cruel to dogs. Yet in North Carolina most dogs rescued from such operations face an even harsher fate. Those that show scars and wounds from fighting are deemed dangerous and…


July 13, 2018

The Government Accountability Office has once again warned Congress that the federal government’s current fiscal trajectory is “unsustainable.”

In a report submitted to Congress on June 21, the GAO notes the federal deficit has continued to grow every year in the last few years.…

Congress Returns

July 11, 2018

Judge Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to replace retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court comes at a tense moment. It could drastically shift the court's tenuous ideological balance, and it comes not long after Senate Republicans disgracefully blocked President Barack Obama from making a…


July 10, 2018

On Monday, President Donald Trump is expected to announce his nominee to replace Justice Anthony Kennedy on the Supreme Court. Given the president's promise to appoint justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade, it's widely understood that his nominee will pose a clear danger to women's reproductive…

Nancy Northup

July 10, 2018

Ordinarily when NATO's 29 national leaders get together, everybody involved pushes for all the good things they want the alliance to do. At this week's summit in Brussels, they'll mainly be hoping to keep anything bad from happening.

The center of Europe's current concerns will come as no surprise:…

Romania NATO Britain Fallon-2

July 08, 2018

Setting aside whether the Senate should confirm a Supreme Court nominee in an election year (the Merrick Garland rule) or whether a president should be allowed to appoint a justice while still under the cloud of the Russian meddling investigation (given the variety of issues such as whether a…


July 07, 2018

After the Parkland, Fla., school shooting in February but before this year’s legislative session, N.C. House Speaker Tim Moore said he wanted to address school safety issues but only those measures that could have bipartisan support.

But Moore killed a proposal similar to one included in a…

Tim Moore
105 stories in Editorials. Viewing 1 through 10.
«First Page   «Previous Page        
Page 1 of 11
        Next Page»   Last Page»