No BYH to those who have been slamming the US mail, which will presently deliver a document to Alaska or Hawaii for .50...

Transit will waste tax dollars


John Hood


Sunday, December 10, 2017

North Carolina is urbanizing. One of its urban areas, Charlotte, has an extensive transit system that includes rail lines. Another urban area, the Triangle, is currently embarking on a major expansion of transit service, including some rail. Leaders in the Triad, Asheville, Wilmington, and other places are also working on, or at least dreaming of, large-scale transit systems.

Do these developments excite you, annoy you, or bore you? If the former, you are probably a progressive Democrat. If either of the latter, you probably aren’t.

Count me among the annoyed. I understand the politics. While most North Carolinians, even urbanites, have no plans to use transit on a regular basis, they believe that others will — and that such a shift of commuters from automobiles to buses or trains will make it easier to drive to and from work. Thus these voters express support for transit, particularly if they think the cost can be shifted to taxpayers elsewhere in the state or nation.

Such politically appealing notions bear little relationship to reality. Outside of New York and few other large cities, transit accounts for a tiny fraction of daily travel. That’s not going to change.

In the Charlotte area, transit is used for about one-half of a percent of all trips, about 3 percent of all commuting, and just 4.4 percent of the commuting to and from the center of the city. In Raleigh, the shares are even lower — two-tenths of a point for all trips, 1.1 percent for all commutes, and 2.1 percent for downtown commutes.

North Carolina’s cities are less dense that those of most other states. While some infill development and multi-occupancy projects are happening, our densities will remain far below the average. So no matter how many billions of tax dollars we spend on buses and trains, we can’t expect the share of our commutes carried by transit to rise into the double-digits anytime soon.

Transit boosters insist that automotive transportation is just as subsidized, if not more so, but this is simply bonkers. Motorists or their customers bear the vast majority of the cost of operating the system — even if you include externalized costs such as air pollution — through fees, tolls, taxes, and direct charges.

The latter source, “direct charges,” is the largest. Keep in mind that public streets, roads, and bridges are only the surface where automotive transportation happens. The system itself mostly consists of private operation of private assets. That is, about 80 percent of the annual outlay is to buy, fuel, maintain, repair, insure, and operate cars and trucks. If you factor in the monetary value of the time we spend driving ourselves, that ratio would rise still higher.

Some people are shut out of automobility due to poverty or disability. There are ways to address their needs that don’t involve massive capital expenditures or intrusive attempts to engineer transit-friendly “smart growth.”

Unfortunately, the issue rarely comes down to practicality. As on so many other issues, there is a clash of visions here. While even among hard-core Democrats the share of voters who use transit regularly is small, progressives are overwhelmingly in favor of transit subsidies. Conservatives are overwhelmingly against them.

More generally, according to a recent set of polls by the Pew Research Center, about 70 percent of the group of voters it calls Solid Liberals say they would prefer to live in communities where “the houses are smaller and closer to each other, but schools, stores, and restaurants are within walking distance.” On the other hand, about 70 percent of those classified by Pew as conservatives say they prefer communities where “the houses are larger and farther apart, but schools, stores, and restaurants are several miles away.”

To the extent government regulation inhibits the dense neighborhoods that many urban progressives desire, I’d end it. But not enough residents will join the progressives in those places, and give up their cars, to justify large-scale transit systems. That’s not in North Carolina’s future. Alas, lots of wasteful spending is.

John Hood is chairman of the John Locke Foundation.


Humans of Greenville


Local photographer Joe Pellegrino explores Greenville to create a photographic census of its people.

Op Ed

September 24, 2018

Baltimore Sun

Stop us when this sounds familiar: A woman comes forward to allege sexual misconduct by a nominee to the United States Supreme Court. Her credibility and motives are attacked. She is invited to give testimony about some of the most painful moments of her life before a panel of…

September 24, 2018

Do you want to hear some good news? For many readers across North Carolina who are still suffering from or cleaning up after the ravages of Hurricane Florence, some good news might be a welcome relief.

On the other hand, there is a built-in human tendency to pay more attention to bad news. Our…

john hood

September 24, 2018

You don't need to spend time on Twitter to realize that politics is not bringing out the best in us, to put it mildly. The Brett Kavanaugh confirmation ordeal seems to be some kind of breaking point. And yet, haven't we had many of them over the past weeks, months and years — and decades?…

September 23, 2018

Christine Blasey Ford has accused Brett M. Kavanaugh of attempted rape while they were both in high school — a charge he unequivocally denies. She can't remember the date the alleged attack took place. She isn't even certain about the year (although she reportedly thinks it may have been the…


September 22, 2018

Here is America at its best: Faith-based organizations across the country are volunteering to help resettle refugee families in their communities. In the Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C. where we live, Christian, Jewish and Muslim congregations have formed a partnership called Neighbors to…

Steve and Cokie Roberts

September 22, 2018

Bloomberg Opinion

President Donald Trump's planned nomination of Nellie Liang to the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors, which oversees everything from interest-rate policy to financial stability, is a little surprising. She's admirably well-qualified and in every way a good choice.

Trump hasn't…

September 22, 2018

An oft-used, if hackneyed, axiom is: Close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades. Applied to politics, it means that if you lose a special election, don't try again in the general.

Danny O'Connor says he's going to defy that conventional wisdom. Last month, the 32 year-old Democrat barely…

albert hunt

September 22, 2018

There was the thought of leaping onto a desk and screaming “you tell ‘em” when a three-judge federal panel delivered a stern comeuppance for lawyers representing the General Assembly in the ongoing congressional redistricting case.

In their order last week to stay action of their…

Redistricting North Carolina

September 22, 2018

It happened once again with Hurricane Florence. Whenever North Carolina is in crisis — such as with storms or other catastrophes — we collectively rise to the occasion. Politics, rivalries and past animosities disappear, and we witness the best of humanity.

We have to commend state…

Tom Campbell.jpg

September 21, 2018

Where is James Baker when we need him?

The political maneuvering required to get Judge Brett Kavanaugh confirmed to the Supreme Court is probably the most important and consequential since the Florida recount in 2000, so deftly navigated by the old Republican hand Baker on behalf of George W. Bush.…

297 stories in Op Ed. Viewing 1 through 10.
«First Page   «Previous Page        
Page 1 of 30
        Next Page»   Last Page»