BMH. I found a Frosted Flake in my cereal this morning that looked like Harry Smith....

Amendment weakens already weak governor post

john hood.jpg

John Hood


Monday, October 8, 2018

During a recent debate about one of six constitutional amendments on North Carolina’s 2018 ballot, General Assembly special counsel Brent Woodcox made an important observation: you don’t know what you think you know.

That is, if Republicans assume they will retain control the North Carolina legislature in perpetuity, or Democrats assume they will retain control of the governor’s office, they are making an unwise leap of faith.

Just weeks before the 2010 midterms, for example, Democrats thought it was highly improbable they would lose the General Assembly. Except for a brief GOP House majority in the mid-1990s, Democrats had run the place for a century. But thanks to well-run campaigns and voter discontent with then-President Obama, Republicans won 26 seats — one of the largest political swings in North Carolina history.

Similarly, in 2016 voters reelected U.S. Sen. Richard Burr and clinched North Carolina’s 15 electoral votes for Donald Trump. Yet Gov. Pat McCrory lost his reelection bid to Democrat Roy Cooper by two-tenths of a percentage point.

Thus, you ought not to base decisions about, say, the constitutional separation of powers on assumptions about who will win future elections. An unpleasant surprise may await you.

Woodcox made this point in the context of a constitutional amendment on this year’s ballot that would change the way state judicial vacancies are filled. Right now, governors get recommendations but have essentially a free hand to pick whomever they wish, including justices to fill vacancies on the North Carolina Supreme Court.

If voters approve the constitutional amendment, however, there would be a multi-step process. First, a commission comprising appointees from all three branches — the governor, the legislature, and the chief justice — would vet prospects submitted by the public. The commission would then forward prospects they deem meritorious to the General Assembly, who in turn would forward at least two prospective judges or justices to the governor.

If the governor declines to appoint either option, the appointment would fall to the legislature or, if it has already ended its regular session, to the chief justice. The appointee would serve until the next available statewide election.

At the debate I attended — held at Salisbury’s historic Meroney Theater by the North Carolina Institute of Political Leadership, the Rowan Chamber of Commerce, and the statewide cable channel Spectrum News — Woodcox argued that this new system, by involving all three branches of government as well as the public at large, would be a major improvement over governors filling vacancies unilaterally.

The other amendment supporter on the IOPL panel, Sen. Paul Newton (R-Cabarrus), also urged a focus on the future rather than short-term partisan assumptions. “What we’ve got to build here is a framework that best serves North Carolina’s interests,” Newton said. “We’ve got to look long-term, and this is a very good way to strengthen our bench.”

The opposing panelists, Sen. Floyd McKissick (D-Durham) and state Democratic Party head Wayne Goodwin, were having none of it. “This whole merit selection process is completely devoid of merit,” McKissick said. “It was a political grab from the outset.”

McKissick and Goodwin repeatedly made the point that, as far as institutional powers are concerned, North Carolina governors are relatively weak by national standards. They’re right. According to the latest edition of Politics in the American States, a standard text, North Carolina’s governors are the second-weakest in the United States (Oregon’s are the weakest).

Why? In most states, governors run a larger share of the executive branch. They have much-stronger veto power. They have more control over budgeting.

In one key area, appointment power, North Carolina’s governors are right at the national average. The judicial-vacancies amendment would crimp that power a bit. Speaking for myself, I don’t necessarily object to involving the legislature in filling judicial vacancies. But I’d prefer to offset that loss of power by, say, giving the governor an item-reduction veto.

Don’t evaluate either idea based on who currently occupies North Carolina’s executive mansion. In this case, it is more practical to be theoretical.

John Hood is chairman of the John Locke Foundation of Raleigh.


Humans of Greenville


Local photographer Joe Pellegrino explores Greenville to create a photographic census of its people.

Op Ed

March 19, 2019

It was one of the deadliest years in the history of North Carolina’s prison system. Five prison employees were killed in two incidents at state prisons in 2017. Given the way our prisons were staffed and the guards were trained and equipped, we should have seen it coming.

The two incidents…

March 19, 2019

"America is addicted to political contempt."

I'm not sure I've ever read a more accurate diagnosis of what we're looking at in the United States right now.

I'm quoting from a new book by Arthur C. Brooks, "Love Your Enemies: How Decent People Can Save America From the Culture of Contempt." I had…


March 19, 2019

The N.C. House has taken a long overdue step toward transparency, voting unanimously to add online video streaming of its sessions — so North Carolinians across the state can watch their government in action without driving to Raleigh.

The legislature currently offers online audio streams of…

Colin Campbell

March 18, 2019

American states and localities are, on the whole, administered more responsibly than the federal government is. Their superiority has nothing to do with the qualities of individuals involved. Indeed, many federal politicians were once state or local politicians.

The difference is institutional.…

john hood.jpg

March 17, 2019

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's, D-Calif., announcement that she is "not for impeachment" has caused resistance on the left. Pelosi is not trying to protect President Trump. She is trying to protect the Democratic Party from its lunatic fringe. It's an increasingly difficult challenge.

Pelosi is the…


March 17, 2019

On Feb. 12, Joaquin Guzman Loera, aka "El Chapo," was convicted of multiple crimes related to running the Sinaloa drug cartel, Mexico's largest. Thirteen days before his conviction, authorities seized enough of the synthetic opioid called fentanyl for 100 million lethal doses. It was hidden in a…

George Will

March 17, 2019

When President Trump signed the tax cut bill around the end of 2017, the most significant pro-growth legislation since the 1980s, the U.S. economy took off like an Atlas rocket.

Employment rose, unemployment sank, consumer spending surged, the stock market shot up, and the U.S. economy was back in…


March 16, 2019

The Washington Post

The best that can be said for President Trump’s $4.75 trillion budget plan for fiscal 2020 is that it has no chance of becoming law. This is almost always true of presidential budgets, because ultimately Congress does the nitty-gritty work on spending legislation. Even by…

March 16, 2019

For a "progressive" presidential candidate, U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) is remarkably, well, conservative. Her proposals are neither new nor of the "democratic socialist" variety. In fact, her aim is, as Matthew Yglesias puts it at Vox, "to save capitalism" with stock proposals…


March 16, 2019

This weekend marks the end of a sports era. Since I was around at the beginning, I want to join others in mourning the loss of over-the-air broadcasts of ACC sports.

Most pundits incorrectly credit the genesis of televised college basketball to the 1957 UNC championships. But it was actually UNC…

292 stories in Op Ed. Viewing 1 through 10.
«First Page   «Previous Page        
Page 1 of 30
        Next Page»   Last Page»