Loading...
BYH, a hamberder is like a hamburger, except served cold on a silver platter by an idiot....

Amendment weakens already weak governor post

john hood.jpg

John Hood

Loading…

Monday, October 8, 2018

During a recent debate about one of six constitutional amendments on North Carolina’s 2018 ballot, General Assembly special counsel Brent Woodcox made an important observation: you don’t know what you think you know.

That is, if Republicans assume they will retain control the North Carolina legislature in perpetuity, or Democrats assume they will retain control of the governor’s office, they are making an unwise leap of faith.

Just weeks before the 2010 midterms, for example, Democrats thought it was highly improbable they would lose the General Assembly. Except for a brief GOP House majority in the mid-1990s, Democrats had run the place for a century. But thanks to well-run campaigns and voter discontent with then-President Obama, Republicans won 26 seats — one of the largest political swings in North Carolina history.

Similarly, in 2016 voters reelected U.S. Sen. Richard Burr and clinched North Carolina’s 15 electoral votes for Donald Trump. Yet Gov. Pat McCrory lost his reelection bid to Democrat Roy Cooper by two-tenths of a percentage point.

Thus, you ought not to base decisions about, say, the constitutional separation of powers on assumptions about who will win future elections. An unpleasant surprise may await you.

Woodcox made this point in the context of a constitutional amendment on this year’s ballot that would change the way state judicial vacancies are filled. Right now, governors get recommendations but have essentially a free hand to pick whomever they wish, including justices to fill vacancies on the North Carolina Supreme Court.

If voters approve the constitutional amendment, however, there would be a multi-step process. First, a commission comprising appointees from all three branches — the governor, the legislature, and the chief justice — would vet prospects submitted by the public. The commission would then forward prospects they deem meritorious to the General Assembly, who in turn would forward at least two prospective judges or justices to the governor.

If the governor declines to appoint either option, the appointment would fall to the legislature or, if it has already ended its regular session, to the chief justice. The appointee would serve until the next available statewide election.

At the debate I attended — held at Salisbury’s historic Meroney Theater by the North Carolina Institute of Political Leadership, the Rowan Chamber of Commerce, and the statewide cable channel Spectrum News — Woodcox argued that this new system, by involving all three branches of government as well as the public at large, would be a major improvement over governors filling vacancies unilaterally.

The other amendment supporter on the IOPL panel, Sen. Paul Newton (R-Cabarrus), also urged a focus on the future rather than short-term partisan assumptions. “What we’ve got to build here is a framework that best serves North Carolina’s interests,” Newton said. “We’ve got to look long-term, and this is a very good way to strengthen our bench.”

The opposing panelists, Sen. Floyd McKissick (D-Durham) and state Democratic Party head Wayne Goodwin, were having none of it. “This whole merit selection process is completely devoid of merit,” McKissick said. “It was a political grab from the outset.”

McKissick and Goodwin repeatedly made the point that, as far as institutional powers are concerned, North Carolina governors are relatively weak by national standards. They’re right. According to the latest edition of Politics in the American States, a standard text, North Carolina’s governors are the second-weakest in the United States (Oregon’s are the weakest).

Why? In most states, governors run a larger share of the executive branch. They have much-stronger veto power. They have more control over budgeting.

In one key area, appointment power, North Carolina’s governors are right at the national average. The judicial-vacancies amendment would crimp that power a bit. Speaking for myself, I don’t necessarily object to involving the legislature in filling judicial vacancies. But I’d prefer to offset that loss of power by, say, giving the governor an item-reduction veto.

Don’t evaluate either idea based on who currently occupies North Carolina’s executive mansion. In this case, it is more practical to be theoretical.

John Hood is chairman of the John Locke Foundation of Raleigh.

Loading…

Humans of Greenville

@HumansofGville

Local photographer Joe Pellegrino explores Greenville to create a photographic census of its people.

Op Ed

January 16, 2019 - 24 minutes ago

As you may have heard by now, there was a rather maddening side story to the veto override votes that took place during the week between Christmas and New Year's Day at the North Carolina General Assembly. As commentator Thomas Mills rightfully pointed out on the website Politics NC, had all…

Rob Schofield

January 16, 2019 - 24 minutes ago

Here are a couple of easy immigration questions — answerable with a simple "yes" or "no" — we might ask any American of any political stripe: Does everyone in the world have a right to live in the U.S.? Do the American people have a right, through their elected representatives, to…

Walter Williams

January 15, 2019

LOS ANGELES TIMES

With the conspicuous exception of President Trump and some of his supporters, Americans were appalled when it was revealed that Russian “troll farms” had launched a disinformation campaign on social media designed to influence the 2016 election. But online deception…

January 15, 2019

U.S. Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., defeated Democrat Deborah Ross in 2016 in a race infused with $55 million in outside money.

We already knew North Carolina’s senior U.S. senator was awash in NRA cash. We already knew the pro-gun group spent $5.6 million in 2016 against his Democratic opponent,…

Senate 2016 North Carolina Debate-2

January 15, 2019

According to the headline at CNN, "Trump bears most blame for shutdown."

But according to the CNN/SSRS poll the story is based on, the question asked was "Who do you think is more responsible for the government shutdown?" (emphasis mine).

Those are two entirely different questions. "Blame" is only…

Knapp

January 15, 2019

If you drive into downtown Raleigh from the north, some of the first buildings you'll see are boarded-up, dilapidated brick structures on the left side of Dawson Street.

"Downtown Raleigh's supposed to have a booming real-estate market," you might think to yourself. "Surely a developer would want…

Colin Campbell

January 14, 2019

Chicago Tribune

December saw many of us nestled inside watching romantic Hallmark Channel movies, but January brings a counterpunch: a twisted Lifetime saga of sexual abuse and control. Not romance-gone-wrong escapism, this is a six-part documentary: “Surviving R. Kelly,” an examination…

January 14, 2019

Two years into his presidency, Donald Trump is still trying to convince Congress to cough up billions of hard-earned tax dollars to build his wall on the southern border with Mexico.

He originally promised voters that Mexico would pay for the 2,000-mile concrete wall, and his supporters swallowed…

lambro2

January 14, 2019

Over the past eight years, conservative lawmakers have done much to constrain the excesses, expenses, and abuses of governmental power in North Carolina. They have cut taxes, controlled spending, slashed regulations, and increased the cost-effectiveness of services by introducing more choice and…

john hood.jpg

January 13, 2019

As we predicted two weeks ago, “In the end, he [Pres. Trump] may resort to pulling funds out of the Pentagon to pay for his wall.” Now he is claiming a state of emergency exists on the Mexican border so he can do just that.

He says he can go to the Pentagon and get money for his wall,…

douglascohn.jpg
322 stories in Op Ed. Viewing 1 through 10.
«First Page   «Previous Page        
Page 1 of 33
        Next Page»   Last Page»