Loading...
No BYH to Trump voters, you elected a bulldozer to our norms, institutions and very stability. and whatever happens...

No done deals in midterms

Margaret Sullivan

Margaret Sullivan

Loading…

Wednesday, October 17, 2018

After the roller-coaster ride of 2016's election night, have journalists and political junkies learned not to let conventional wisdom substitute for hard knowledge?

Nate Silver, the closest thing there is to a celebrity in the arcane field of statistical journalism, is not wildly optimistic about that.

"Media understanding about probability, margin of error and uncertainty is very poor," Silver said Monday afternoon when I stopped by the Manhattan office of his fivethirtyeight.com.

"That led them to be more surprised than they should have been," he said, based on the quite accurate polling numbers that were available.

Now that we're three weeks away from the midterm elections, Silver is seeing some of the same tendencies in media coverage and social-media chatter that plagued 2016's coverage.

Take the Senate challenge to Republican incumbent Ted Cruz of Texas by Beto O'Rourke, for instance.

When the polls had O'Rourke's chances of upsetting Cruz at a 35 percent probability, the media chatter had it as almost a toss-up. Now that those chances have dropped to about 25 percent, the prevailing narrative has downgraded O'Rourke almost to dead-man-walking status.

"That's not a night-and-day change, but that's how it's being talked about," Silver said. Which leads to his worry about coverage over the next few weeks, and particularly in the days leading up to Nov. 6.

"I get nervous about how people overstate things" he told me. That, for example, it's "all but inevitable" that Democrats will win control of the House of Representatives or that there's really no way Republicans will lose the Senate.

"Saying it's all but inevitable should signal it's at 98 percent, not 80 percent," which is the reality at the moment, he said.

While it's quite probable — and has become slightly more likely — that we'll see a split decision in Congress, there's a solid chance it doesn't go that way.

There's actually a 40 percent chance that both houses of Congress will end up in the hands of one party, Silver said. That's because, in each case, there's about a one in five chance that the less likely outcome will happen: That Republicans will retain the House or that Democrats will win the Senate.

Silver has had his own ups and downs with predicting election outcomes, including during 2016. He infamously stated during the primary that Trump's candidacy was not to be taken seriously. When proved wrong, he followed up with a thorough self-examination, published on his site, that he was thinking too much like a political journalist and not enough like a statistician.

On the plus side, his final-days projections were better than most: He gave Hillary Clinton roughly a 7 in 10 chance of winning, with Trump at about 3 in 10. And he doesn't fault the polls, which were quite accurate, he said:

"There are lots of reasons the outcome was surprising, but the polls were the least of it."

Midterm elections present their own predictive challenges: There's a lot less data, fewer polls to analyze, in states and regions than in a national election.

So while lots of people think they know exactly what's going to happen — and are more than willing to hold forth as if they're infallible — there's still a lot of uncertainty, given the numbers.

"People should not be that surprised by a Democratic Senate or a Republican House," Silver told me. "We're in dangerous territory from a predictive/assumption standpoint."

A four-in-five chance may sound like a done deal, but it simply isn't.

But, I asked, didn't the media learn these lessons, once and for all, two years ago?

"People do learn things the hard way," he acknowledged, and there was no harder way than election night 2016. So he's observing more necessary caution this time around.

Whether that caution will last into Election Day itself is another equation altogether.

That doesn't mean that the polls are useless or that nobody knows anything.

It just means that probability is one thing — and inevitability is quite another.

Margaret Sullivan is The Washington Post’s media columnist. Previously, she was the New York Times public editor, and the chief editor of the Buffalo News.

Loading…

Humans of Greenville

@HumansofGville

Local photographer Joe Pellegrino explores Greenville to create a photographic census of its people.

Op Ed

January 20, 2019

The Wall Street Journal

By now readers have heard that progressive luminary Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez supports a 70 percent top marginal tax rate, which she says will help finance a “green new deal.” Higher taxes on the rich is the stock socialist answer on how to pay for any project,…

January 20, 2019

The New York Times reports that in the days after President Donald Trump fired James B. Comey as FBI director, law enforcement officials became “so concerned by the president's behavior that they began investigating whether he had been working on behalf of Russia against American interests.…

Knapp

January 20, 2019

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has written President Trump to suggest that he postpone his State of the Union address, citing her "security concerns" over the ability of the Secret Service and Department of Homeland Security to protect government officials during the shutdown.

With all due respect,…

Marc_Thiessen

January 20, 2019

It was an extraordinary year.

No, that’s not boosterism by two of ECU’s biggest fans. It was a truly amazing year.

No question, 2018 was colored by the departures of our athletics director, a football coach and a basketball coach, a lot of change in one year. Follow those departures…

082116GuestColumnStatonPic.jpg

January 20, 2019

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is driving President Trump nuts — a very short drive indeed — by doing something he simply cannot abide: She's stealing the spotlight.

She is also seizing the initiative in the trench warfare over Trump's government shutdown and his imaginary border wall,…

Eugene Robinson

January 19, 2019

“Drain the swamp!” was one of those memorable Donald Trump campaign promises that remains unfulfilled, much like “Mexico will pay for the wall!” and “Repeal and replace Obamacare!” with “something terrific.”

Unlike the latter two promises,…

Senate EPA Wheeler-1

January 19, 2019

As state superintendent of North Carolina’s public schools, I often hear from other leaders that standardized tests help hold students, teachers and schools accountable. Accountability is important for our schools but also for our leaders. The testing system that the education-industrial…

Mark Johnson

January 19, 2019

Imagine traveling from Raleigh to Charlotte in about 22 minutes; not by train, plane or car, but instead in a pod, transported through an almost friction-free tunnel. This concept is under experimentation right now, as nearly 1,000 learned last week at the N.C. Transportation Summit.

Sponsored by…

020417Campbell

January 17, 2019

President Trump's political strategy is completely clear: use his persistent promotion of a border wall to energize his core supporters. His campaign manager, Brad Parscale, told Fox News that "border security" is the "No. 1 reason" those ardent advocates will vote to re-elect him. Trump himself…

Steve and Cokie Roberts

January 17, 2019

Since the Knights of Columbus recently became a political issue, I've seen a constant refrain on social media that goes something along the lines of: "What do you mean, the pancake breakfast guys?" The point being: Could you be picking on nicer guys? But the Knights' goodness goes far beyond…

kathrynlopez
324 stories in Op Ed. Viewing 1 through 10.
«First Page   «Previous Page        
Page 1 of 33
        Next Page»   Last Page»