BYH: To the city of Greenville. You spend dollars promoting uptown Greenville to draw many in. Now you want to drive...

Convoluted judicial amendment subverts voters

Chris McCoy.jpg
1 of 2

Chris McCoy

Chris Bonneau.JPG

Saturday, November 3, 2018

Rube Goldberg was famous for designing humorously convoluted machines meant to perform simple tasks. But we doubt he could have dreamed up anything like the complex mess that is the judicial selection constitutional amendment.

Sadly, the amendment doesn’t even have the benefit of being funny — in fact, it’s downright pernicious. It deserves a “no” vote this November.

North Carolina elects its judges — supreme court justices along with appeals, superior, and district court judges. Elections are one way to ensure that judges are accountable to the people for their actions on the bench.

However, it can be impractical to hold an election whenever a judicial vacancy arises in the middle of a term. If that happens, there is a straightforward process — the governor appoints a replacement to serve until the next election more than 60 days after the vacancy. If people don’t like how a judge performs, they have someone — the governor — to hold accountable.

The judicial selection amendment would scrap that in favor of an unelected, unaccountable commission charged with creating a list of “qualified” nominees to fill a vacancy. That list would be handed off to the legislature, which would winnow it to at least two and send those names to the governor, who would select one. If the governor refuses, the legislature picks. These judges could serve up to four years before ever facing the voters.

To be clear, the real power in this process would lie not with any elected officials, but with the commission, which would have sole discretion to determine who is qualified based on as-yet-unknown criteria. That is a problem because, as scholars have shown, what the people want from judges is not always what the legal elites or political appointees serving on judicial commissions want.

Furthermore, such commissions would deprive citizens of any real say while insulating politicians from criticism. If a judge doesn’t work out, the governor can say “My hands were tied” and point to the legislature, which can say “Our hands were tied” and point to the commission, which is beyond the people’s reach.

In other states using them, judicial commissions are dominated by legal special interest groups and have become good ol’ boy networks that nominate commission cronies. State bar associations and trial lawyers have more say than the people — a fate North Carolina should avoid.

Legislators are counting on that zero accountability, particularly if the commission emboldens them to attempt some court packing scheme to shift the court’s balance. In its official summary, the State Board of Elections points out the legislature could add two seats to the state Supreme Court after the election, both of which would be subject to the new commission process (assuming it passes). This is a way to subvert the will of the voters.

While there are no guarantees with a commission, it would certainly improve the odds that the legislature gets nominees more to its liking than what the governor would propose. All the while, lawmakers could avoid accountability by hiding behind the commission’s independence and its evaluation of nominees.

But what should really concern North Carolinians about this amendment is that it is the camel’s nose under the tent. In 1996, a commission studying the state’s court system recommended doing away with judicial elections and moving to a commission system. Earlier this year, lawmakers considered that very idea before settling on this amendment.

While you may need a law degree to understand this amendment, you don’t have to be a genius to see where we could eventually end up if it passes — a commission that replaces judicial elections entirely, leaving citizens with no one to hold accountable. Passing this amendment lays that groundwork.

As a judge might put it, voters should dismiss this amendment with prejudice. That means permanently killing this bad idea with a resounding “no” vote.

Chris McCoy is state director of Americans for Prosperity-North Carolina. Chris W. Bonneau is associate professor of political science at the University of Pittsburgh specializing in judicial selection.


Humans of Greenville


Local photographer Joe Pellegrino explores Greenville to create a photographic census of its people.

Op Ed

August 21, 2019

For many parents, August is a month of both pride and tears. Pride because their teenager is taking that big educational step and tears because for many it's the beginning of an empty nest. Yet, there's a going-away-to-college question that far too few parents ask or even contemplate: What will my…

Walter Williams

August 18, 2019

I have had the distinct honor and privilege of leading the Greenville VA Health Care Center as the Administrator and Associate Administrator since November 2016.

Over the past two and a half years, I have enjoyed working all of the veterans and staff members as we grew together, overcame obstacles,…


July 23, 2019

Since being sworn in January, I have been working hard to help the people I represent in Lenoir and Pitt counties — and the biggest opportunity to do this has been through the state budget. I’ve talked with elected officials, educators, administrators, nonprofits, business owners,…


July 12, 2019

Over the past three years, I have had the good fortune to work on a project that has the potential to transform the farming landscape in eastern North Carolina, one that involves harnessing gas produced from hog waste.

As CEO and founder of OptimaBio, our work with Smithfield Foods to capture…


July 01, 2019

The American system of checks and balances government does not work the way most people think it does or the way the Founding Fathers said it would.

The president serves at the pleasure of Congress, just as the prime minister of the UK serves at the pleasure of Parliament, which means that the…


June 26, 2019

Several Democratic presidential hopefuls are calling for Americans to make reparations for slavery. On June 19, the House judiciary subcommittee on the constitution, civil rights and civil liberties held a hearing. Its stated purpose was "to examine, through open and constructive discourse, the…

Walter Williams

June 10, 2019

The New York Times 

“Because it’s there.” For those who grew up on George Mallory’s famous explanation for his yearning to scale Mount Everest, with all the romance, danger and spirit of exploration it implied, that viral photograph of an endless line of climbers in…

June 10, 2019

Although it may not appear so, the leaders of both major political parties in North Carolina favor lowering the tax burden of large businesses. Their real dispute is about the scope and magnitude of the tax relief.

Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper has consistently opposed recent state budgets, crafted by…

john hood.jpg

June 10, 2019

We are just weeks away from the first of 20 Democratic debates scheduled this primary season. It gets underway over two nights in Miami on June 26 and 27, and never before has there been a debate this early in the election and potentially this important.

The reason there are so many candidates, 23…


June 09, 2019

Gerrymandering has always been part of American politics. After all, the term was coined in 1812 after Massachusetts governor and Founding Father Elbridge Gerry endorsed a state senate district that resembled a salamander.

Until recently, federal courts have been highly reluctant to enter the…

Steve and Cokie Roberts
107 stories in Op Ed. Viewing 1 through 10.
«First Page   «Previous Page        
Page 1 of 11
        Next Page»   Last Page»