Loading...
Bless the heart of the stormwater advisory group that suggested to raise the stormwater fees to record levels. I wonder...

Roberts counterpunches counterpunching president

HughHewitt

Hugh Hewitt

Loading…

Sunday, December 2, 2018

President Donald Trump does not need, and should not pursue, a war of words with Chief Justice John Roberts. Both lead equal branches of government. Neither would benefit from ongoing anvil tossing, especially at a time when Trump has no attorney general who can command the respect and attention of the legal community.

Full disclosure: Roberts is an old colleague, with whom I shared a suite in the old Executive Office Building at the beginning of President Ronald Reagan's second term. I am also one of the few very vocal defenders among originalists of the chief justice's decision in the 2012 case against Obamacare that earned him an unwarranted suspicion among many in the tribe of my jurisprudential leanings.

Quite simply, courts ought not to strike down federal laws passed by Congress and signed by the president if there is any way to avoid doing so. The chief justice found such a path and, along the way, revivified limits to the Constitution's spending clause while cementing the border around the reach of the interstate commerce clause. Nice work, that opinion. It is a modern Marbury v. Madison and will be understood as such some decades down the line.

The chief justice's concurrence in Citizens United v. FEC is another jewel — an accessible and understandable yet comprehensive and precise statement of the stare decisis doctrine and its limits. Read it if you'd like a look ahead at where the court is going and why.

I hope the Roberts court plunges into a wholesale revamp of the jerry-rigged fire trap of establishment clause jurisprudence and that it levels the God-awful collection of incoherent holdings I must annually pretend to teach by memorization. (A law professor can no more teach "establishment clause jurisprudence" than a math professor can teach the square root of two).

I hope as well that the court makes free-exercise rights more robust. And that it turbocharges the Fifth Amendment's long-dormant prohibition against taking property without just compensation, with the recognition that the public must pay property owners whenever an endangered-species listing or a critical-habitat designation devalues their land. The Supreme Court may also exile, finally, the use of race in the bestowing of benefits or infliction of penalties, and banish from its docket redistricting challenges — as redistricting belongs to the legislative and executive branches of the states, not the majority of nine unelected justices.

So we are at the dawn of a new era of an old idea: constitutional seriousness. The ground rules matter. And the Constitution's meaning, as understood at the time it was ratified or amended or interpreted before 2018, matters. The document, written mostly by farmers (smart farmers, but men steeped in the hard rules of agriculture), debated mostly by farmers and ratified mostly by farmers, is a plain document. It ought to be read plainly.

When the chief justice speaks plainly to the president or to political parties, people notice. Good. Roberts did to Trump last week what he did to President Barack Obama in the aftermath of the 2010 State of the Union address when 44 blasted the court for its ruling in Citizens United. Roberts sallied forth then with this comment: "The image of having the members of one branch of government standing up, literally surrounding the Supreme Court, cheering and hollering while the court — according to the requirements of protocol — has to sit there expressionless, I think is very troubling." Roberts was right then. He was right Wednesday.

Now the chief justice has counterpunched the counterpunching president. Good, again. That's the job of the chief justice. He leads an independent branch of the Constitution's design, and independence is a dish best served hot. So it was.

Trump was wise not to provide a nickname for the chief justice. He'd be wiser still to leave off this particular debate. Get an attorney general the equal of the chief justice when it comes to intellect and constitutional chops and let them have at it. Bravo to the chief justice for calling a foul ball. We can hope the president doesn't swing on that pitch again.

Hugh Hewitt is a Washington Post columnist, hosts a nationally syndicated radio show and is a professor of law at Chapman University's Fowler School of Law.

Loading…

Humans of Greenville

@HumansofGville

Local photographer Joe Pellegrino explores Greenville to create a photographic census of its people.

Op Ed

December 09, 2018

There's something uncomfortably sterile about life-expectancy rates.

When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that average American life expectancy shortened by a tenth of a year, as it did last year, it's forgivable if the problem isn't immediately obvious. Sure, we might have…

Robert Gebelhoff

December 09, 2018

"When you strike at a king you must kill him," Ralph Waldo Emerson once said. Well, this year China tried to strike at President Trump for daring to launch a trade war with Beijing — and missed the mark entirely.

After Trump imposed massive tariffs on Chinese goods earlier this year,…

MarcThiessen

December 08, 2018

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

“There is no Plan B because there is no Planet B,” Emmanuel Macron lectured Donald Trump — in English — when the American President withdrew from the Paris climate agreement last year. Well, apparently there is a Plan B after all. Macron stopped his…

December 08, 2018

Back in 1897, an eight-year-old girl, prompted by naysaying friends, wrote The New York Sun wanting the truth about the existence of Santa Claus. Today that letter might be answered by apparent congressman-elect Mark Harris, confirming not only Santa’s existence, but also that his name is…

Tom Campbell

December 07, 2018

There is a lot about President George H.W. Bush that we will miss. And the current occupant of the White House puts into vivid relief the things that we will miss the most. Our president today couldn't be more different from Bush. I hope the values that Bush brought to his distinguished career in…

EdRogers

December 07, 2018

All of the leaders assembled at the Group of 20 meeting in Buenos Aires committed their nations to the fight against climate change, except one — President Trump, of course. But pay him no mind. As the proverb says, "The dogs bark but the caravan moves on."

We don't have to wait for history…

Eugene Robinson

December 06, 2018

How does being barefoot make you feel? Relaxed? Uncomfortable? Most people are only barefoot as they prepare for sleep. Most Americans are more comfortable wearing shoes in their own home. Or, at the very least, they’ll keep socks on around the house. There is nothing wrong with this.…

Stoehr

December 06, 2018

In response to the toppling in August of the Confederate Monument at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chancellor Carol Folt and other UNC leaders have proposed a controversial solution: a new $5.3 million building on campus that will cost $800,000 a year to operate.

Some are…

john hood

December 06, 2018

Michael Flynn has been waiting for more than a year to be sentenced. The retired three-star Army general, who spent 24 days as the Trump White House national security adviser, pleaded guilty on Dec. 1, 2017, to lying to the FBI in the Trump-Russia investigation. He agreed to cooperate with special…

Byron York

December 05, 2018

The humanitarian crisis at the California-Mexico border demands thoughtfulness and clear thinking from federal, state and local leaders. With thousands of Central Americans in Tijuana seeking asylum after the arrival of their caravan this month — and thousands more still expected in coming…

Central America Migrant Caravan
324 stories in Op Ed. Viewing 1 through 10.
«First Page   «Previous Page        
Page 1 of 33
        Next Page»   Last Page»