Loading...
I have been watching the commercials for the third district race and found it to be a down-to-the-wire-event. We have...

Evidence should shape policy

john hood.jpg

John Hood

Loading…

Friday, January 4, 2019

As dysfunctional as Congress has become, it does manage to enact some useful bills. One of them, the Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018, was championed by outgoing Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Washington). It promotes data-sharing and policy evaluation throughout the federal government.

As popular as the concept is across the spectrum, however, we should all have realistic expectations about its application. While few question the value of basing public policy on careful study of solid evidence, human nature is not easily eluded.

It’s easy to endorse evidence-based policymaking when you assume it will reinforce your existing beliefs, and to assume that your adversaries are the ones whose policies will fail the evidentiary test. To varying degrees, we are all prone to such cognitive temptations as selection bias (noticing and remembering information that fits our preconceived notions or personal interests) and confirmation bias (viewing favorable evidence in the best possible light and contrary evidence in the worst).

While it would be reassuring to assume otherwise, it’s demonstrably clear that motivated reasoning is rampant throughout the political discourse. That doesn’t mean we can’t have informed debates. And it doesn’t mean minds are never changed by solid evidence presented persuasively. But there is nothing automatic about it, because human beings are not automatons.

Over the years, I’ve spotlighted numerous examples of motivated reasoning in action, of what Manhattan Institute fellow Oren Cass termed “policy-based evidence making.” Although I am politically conservative, I don’t limit my examples to those in which progressives are the transgressors.

For example, conservative policymakers are right to observe that the majority of peer-reviewed academic research shows a statistically significant negative relationship between taxes and economic growth. All other things being equal, economies subjected to higher tax rates tend to grow more slowly.

However, conservatives often exaggerate the finding. Some assert that tax cuts pay for themselves in the short run by stimulating so much growth that governments collect more revenue at the lower rates than they would have at the higher ones. This is theoretically possible, if the initial tax burden is high enough, but rare.

At least issues of tax policy are a bit cloudy and debatable. That’s not the case with regard to one of the most egregious errors made by progressives: defending pay supplements for teachers who obtain graduate degrees.

The evidence on this question is overwhelming: teachers with advanced degrees are not more effective, on average, than teachers with only undergraduate degrees.

Here’s what I mean by overwhelming. By my count, there have been more than 100 peer-reviewed studies published since 1990 testing the relationship between advanced degrees and teacher effectiveness. More than 80 percent found no link. Of the handful of studies finding a positive association, the graduate degree is question was typically in science or math, which represent a very small percentage of the graduate degrees for which teachers have received pay bumps.

If we were all truly committed to allowing evidence to guide our policy decisions, the decision of the state General Assembly several years ago to eliminate new supplements for graduate degrees would be widely acclaimed. Instead, Democratic lawmakers, candidates and activists — not to mention some of the policy’s key beneficiaries, education schools — have continued to demand the policy’s reinstatement.

It is certainly the case that no single study or small group of studies, no matter how well designed, can settle any longstanding dispute. That’s not a realistic model for employing evidence in policymaking. Data do not actually “speak for themselves.” They require interpretation. Few interpreters are free from bias.

The best we can do, I suspect, is to ensure that there is a diversity of interpretation in public policymaking — and to commit to reading all of it, not just results that can be expected to confirm our brilliance.

John Hood is chairman of the John Locke Foundation in Raleigh.

Loading…

Humans of Greenville

@HumansofGville

Local photographer Joe Pellegrino explores Greenville to create a photographic census of its people.

Op Ed

June 10, 2019

The New York Times 

“Because it’s there.” For those who grew up on George Mallory’s famous explanation for his yearning to scale Mount Everest, with all the romance, danger and spirit of exploration it implied, that viral photograph of an endless line of climbers in…

June 10, 2019

Although it may not appear so, the leaders of both major political parties in North Carolina favor lowering the tax burden of large businesses. Their real dispute is about the scope and magnitude of the tax relief.

Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper has consistently opposed recent state budgets, crafted by…

john hood.jpg

June 10, 2019

We are just weeks away from the first of 20 Democratic debates scheduled this primary season. It gets underway over two nights in Miami on June 26 and 27, and never before has there been a debate this early in the election and potentially this important.

The reason there are so many candidates, 23…

eleanorclift.jpg.jpg

June 09, 2019

Gerrymandering has always been part of American politics. After all, the term was coined in 1812 after Massachusetts governor and Founding Father Elbridge Gerry endorsed a state senate district that resembled a salamander.

Until recently, federal courts have been highly reluctant to enter the…

Steve and Cokie Roberts

June 09, 2019

It is not unfair to point out that President Trump, on many important subjects, is just an ignoramus.

A vivid illustration of this unfortunate fact came this week in London, when it was revealed that Prince Charles, a knowledgeable environmentalist, had tried to educate the president on climate…

Eugene Robinson

June 09, 2019

"When you are told all your life you're dumb, unworthy, you start believing it. God changed that for me."

Jerry, from Youngstown, Tennessee, hesitated to be interviewed by Chris Arnade, because "I don't know my ABCs, so I can't really talk right." He told Arnade, the author of the new book…

kathrynlopez

June 09, 2019

Senate Republicans are pushing back on President Trump's plan to impose tariffs on Mexico. But if Mexican officials think these Republicans are going to save them from Trump's tariffs, it's time for them to think again.

So far, congressional Republicans have managed to remain bystanders in Trump's…

MarcThiessen

June 08, 2019

In 1940, some 3.6 million people lived in North Carolina, ranking the state 11th in the nation in population and first in the Southeast. Across the South as a whole, only Texas (6.4 million) was more populous.

If present trends continue, by 2040 North Carolina will have a population of about 12.7…

john hood.jpg

June 08, 2019

The Charlotte Observer

How much money is too much for a high school football coach? North Carolina’s second largest school district has provided something of an answer.

Last month, Vance High School coach Aaron Brand cashed in on a successful five-year run in Charlotte and accepted a coaching…

June 08, 2019

In 1788 the Hillsborough Convention convened to consider ratification of the U.S. Constitution and also to approve an “unalterable” seat of government. They did neither.

The Constitution, they determined, lacked assurances of personal rights the delegates deemed essential and, after…

Tom Campbell
231 stories in Op Ed. Viewing 1 through 10.
«First Page   «Previous Page        
Page 1 of 24
        Next Page»   Last Page»