Loading...
No BYH to Trump voters, you elected a bulldozer to our norms, institutions and very stability. and whatever happens...

Evidence should shape policy

john hood.jpg

John Hood

Loading…

Friday, January 4, 2019

As dysfunctional as Congress has become, it does manage to enact some useful bills. One of them, the Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018, was championed by outgoing Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan and Sen. Patty Murray (D-Washington). It promotes data-sharing and policy evaluation throughout the federal government.

As popular as the concept is across the spectrum, however, we should all have realistic expectations about its application. While few question the value of basing public policy on careful study of solid evidence, human nature is not easily eluded.

It’s easy to endorse evidence-based policymaking when you assume it will reinforce your existing beliefs, and to assume that your adversaries are the ones whose policies will fail the evidentiary test. To varying degrees, we are all prone to such cognitive temptations as selection bias (noticing and remembering information that fits our preconceived notions or personal interests) and confirmation bias (viewing favorable evidence in the best possible light and contrary evidence in the worst).

While it would be reassuring to assume otherwise, it’s demonstrably clear that motivated reasoning is rampant throughout the political discourse. That doesn’t mean we can’t have informed debates. And it doesn’t mean minds are never changed by solid evidence presented persuasively. But there is nothing automatic about it, because human beings are not automatons.

Over the years, I’ve spotlighted numerous examples of motivated reasoning in action, of what Manhattan Institute fellow Oren Cass termed “policy-based evidence making.” Although I am politically conservative, I don’t limit my examples to those in which progressives are the transgressors.

For example, conservative policymakers are right to observe that the majority of peer-reviewed academic research shows a statistically significant negative relationship between taxes and economic growth. All other things being equal, economies subjected to higher tax rates tend to grow more slowly.

However, conservatives often exaggerate the finding. Some assert that tax cuts pay for themselves in the short run by stimulating so much growth that governments collect more revenue at the lower rates than they would have at the higher ones. This is theoretically possible, if the initial tax burden is high enough, but rare.

At least issues of tax policy are a bit cloudy and debatable. That’s not the case with regard to one of the most egregious errors made by progressives: defending pay supplements for teachers who obtain graduate degrees.

The evidence on this question is overwhelming: teachers with advanced degrees are not more effective, on average, than teachers with only undergraduate degrees.

Here’s what I mean by overwhelming. By my count, there have been more than 100 peer-reviewed studies published since 1990 testing the relationship between advanced degrees and teacher effectiveness. More than 80 percent found no link. Of the handful of studies finding a positive association, the graduate degree is question was typically in science or math, which represent a very small percentage of the graduate degrees for which teachers have received pay bumps.

If we were all truly committed to allowing evidence to guide our policy decisions, the decision of the state General Assembly several years ago to eliminate new supplements for graduate degrees would be widely acclaimed. Instead, Democratic lawmakers, candidates and activists — not to mention some of the policy’s key beneficiaries, education schools — have continued to demand the policy’s reinstatement.

It is certainly the case that no single study or small group of studies, no matter how well designed, can settle any longstanding dispute. That’s not a realistic model for employing evidence in policymaking. Data do not actually “speak for themselves.” They require interpretation. Few interpreters are free from bias.

The best we can do, I suspect, is to ensure that there is a diversity of interpretation in public policymaking — and to commit to reading all of it, not just results that can be expected to confirm our brilliance.

John Hood is chairman of the John Locke Foundation in Raleigh.

Loading…

Humans of Greenville

@HumansofGville

Local photographer Joe Pellegrino explores Greenville to create a photographic census of its people.

Op Ed

January 19, 2019 - 26 minutes ago

“Drain the swamp!” was one of those memorable Donald Trump campaign promises that remains unfulfilled, much like “Mexico will pay for the wall!” and “Repeal and replace Obamacare!” with “something terrific.”

Unlike the latter two promises,…

Senate EPA Wheeler-1

January 19, 2019 - 26 minutes ago

As state superintendent of North Carolina’s public schools, I often hear from other leaders that standardized tests help hold students, teachers and schools accountable. Accountability is important for our schools but also for our leaders. The testing system that the education-industrial…

Mark Johnson

January 19, 2019 - 26 minutes ago

Imagine traveling from Raleigh to Charlotte in about 22 minutes; not by train, plane or car, but instead in a pod, transported through an almost friction-free tunnel. This concept is under experimentation right now, as nearly 1,000 learned last week at the N.C. Transportation Summit.

Sponsored by…

020417Campbell

January 17, 2019

President Trump's political strategy is completely clear: use his persistent promotion of a border wall to energize his core supporters. His campaign manager, Brad Parscale, told Fox News that "border security" is the "No. 1 reason" those ardent advocates will vote to re-elect him. Trump himself…

Steve and Cokie Roberts

January 17, 2019

Since the Knights of Columbus recently became a political issue, I've seen a constant refrain on social media that goes something along the lines of: "What do you mean, the pancake breakfast guys?" The point being: Could you be picking on nicer guys? But the Knights' goodness goes far beyond…

kathrynlopez

January 17, 2019

The Post's report that President Trump "has gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal details of his conversations with Russian President Vladimir Putin" — including taking away an interpreter's notes and instructing the person not to discuss what was said even with senior officials of his own…

Marc_Thiessen

January 16, 2019

As you may have heard by now, there was a rather maddening side story to the veto override votes that took place during the week between Christmas and New Year's Day at the North Carolina General Assembly. As commentator Thomas Mills rightfully pointed out on the website Politics NC, had all…

Rob Schofield

January 16, 2019

Here are a couple of easy immigration questions — answerable with a simple "yes" or "no" — we might ask any American of any political stripe: Does everyone in the world have a right to live in the U.S.? Do the American people have a right, through their elected representatives, to…

Walter Williams

January 15, 2019

LOS ANGELES TIMES

With the conspicuous exception of President Trump and some of his supporters, Americans were appalled when it was revealed that Russian “troll farms” had launched a disinformation campaign on social media designed to influence the 2016 election. But online deception…

January 15, 2019

U.S. Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., defeated Democrat Deborah Ross in 2016 in a race infused with $55 million in outside money.

We already knew North Carolina’s senior U.S. senator was awash in NRA cash. We already knew the pro-gun group spent $5.6 million in 2016 against his Democratic opponent,…

Senate 2016 North Carolina Debate-2
321 stories in Op Ed. Viewing 1 through 10.
«First Page   «Previous Page        
Page 1 of 33
        Next Page»   Last Page»