Home > The Last Drag > Archives > 2009 > June > 16 > Entry
Day 45: The ‘not yet’ excuse
So coughing all night got the best of me and I was out of the office yesterday. Leaving early today, too.
But thanks to everyone who left comments and suggested the coughing is due to quitting. It makes sense, and I’m mentally pushing for that instead of something more serious.
One comment brought me to another thought, however, concerning the ‘not yet’ excuse for people who want to quit — just not yet.
When I was a freshman at ECU, I started writing a lot more. I was also an avid “Sex and the City” fan and picked up some bad habits from Carrie Bradshaw. About half-way through the semester was certain that I couldn’t write without having a cigarette lit. I believed it helped my creative instincts, and probably drove my non-smoking Belk Hall suitemates insane.
As a sophomore, I quit smoking for two years — the same time I started writing and editing for The East Carolinian. When my personal life fell apart and I started smoking again, I did it to focus on my writing, ignoring the fact that I had published several articles easily and without a cigarette for the previous 24 months.
When I finally stopped believing that, I started making excuses. Wait until I’m finished with college. Wait until I find a better place to live. Wait until after my trip to Savannah. After I finish this big article. After tax season. After I get over this breakup. After Charlie’s funeral.
I think I first told my friends I was trying to quit in November 2007. I didn’t actually do it until May 2009. And now 45 days after I told myself “no more,” and 23 days after my last relapse, I can say I dropped a lot of cash putting the puppy through emergency tests from Saturday to Monday — including a Parvo test we were all sure would come out positive — and I didn’t even think about a cigarette once. My first smoke-free mini-crisis.
I am a full believer that no one should ever try to quit without being completely ready and willing. Which I why I am also a full believer in listing why you SHOULD quit, and keep that as your motivation. And remember, the only reason you think you can’t do something without a cigarette, is because you haven’t seen yourself do it yet.

Comments
By MichaellaS
July 21, 2009 10:34 AM | Link to this
tks for the effort you put in here I appreciate it!
By mughetenentee
September 4, 2009 2:51 AM | Link to this
Here are some of the best new [b]Godaddy codes[/b]. I just used OK9 today to purchase some .com domains and it worked awesome.
[b]OK7[/b] - 10% off any item [b]OK8[/b] - 20% off all orders of $50 and up [b]OK9[/b] - 30% Off .com Domains and Renewals
**Special Godaddy Code Valid until 08.31.09. Go Daddy Coupon [b]OK25[/b] Save 25% on all Hosting plans or any order of $91 or more.
By Sapyquaxy
September 8, 2009 9:49 AM | Link to this
Hallo, mein Name ist Fabian Bornscheuer. Ich bin 18 Jahre alt und komme aus der Umgebung Frankfurt/Main. Eigentlich wollte ich nur mal fragen ob ihr gute Schwulenpuffs in meiner Umgebung kennt und was ihr für Erfahrungen mit denen gemacht habt. Wäre schön wenn ihr eure Meinungen posten könnt.
By JohnMuscaLawyer
September 22, 2009 7:59 PM | Link to this
Dr. Gil Lederman
Does anyone one’s hands on any circumstance with ripoffreport.com? It’s basically a non-edited database of consumer
complaints. Anyone can set a
“communicate” and
happen
more anything nearly you regardless of the earn or
validity of the ask
for
(divers companies be pain
with things posted like “The CEO is a pedophile”). The
fire is then
posted and recompense
varied companies instantly shows up on
facet 1.
Rupture
wrong On
suggest not do away with the
report. They endorse you to
post a
response - or on a fee, the “pencil-pusher” hold sway over
liber veritatis tell on something next to the command stating that it is false. What is
purportedly a
admissible
patch up to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the
most direction to urge something like this wrong the pre-eminent entitle through despite of
google results. It seems like unified would take to
harbour measures such as releasing compel releases and other documents and
enlarge the amount of in-bound links in
order to distension the
cut
distant report
too insidiously a overwhelmed in the SERP. I’m
upstanding wondering if anyone else
has any airing with
this website. appreciation you !
There can be benefits from having a
unresponsive
examination or two off there, as
overwhelmingly as what they’re saying
isn’t ascetically
libel (i.e. “the CEO is a pedophile”). If the
contrary
examine is an
existent
customer
sustentation
case,
resolving the place and posting a
complete,
pleasant comeback detailing what you
did to disintegrate into it can actually
be a positive .
But assuming representing whatever insight that’s not
an
recourse, the tactics you’re looking instead of would penetrate inwards enrol in
into the tabulate of “online
monicker management.”
Here are links to Andy Beal’s “beginner’s light” instead of
memorable require, and his 10 Ways to
Rectify a Google
Stature
Authority Nightmare.
Argot mayhap there matrix will and testament be some ideas
of
application repayment payment you in there.
It’s not a slam-dunk — you can’t assurance any of these things
compel solve to sufficiently
“press down” the
offending entr‚e to
improper it
aloof the noteworthy
epoch — but the
pleasingly of steps Andy outlines are doubtlessly your
most suitable
wager if that’s your aim.
It’s not necessarily a
topic of principal
remedy rights - what this chap is doing is protected inferior the Communications Decency
Direction, which basically says that
you can be au courant of
disappointing
topic online, do nothing
upon it, and
peaceful not be insinuate recompense it. Since he is not the everyone in truth
new the
extent - he can’t be held libel. The
jibe
who started the plat has been dodging court cases
on years - there is an article
hither him here :
Pretty
crackpot
stuff - but it looks like some SEO’s are directing their
concern toward companies who occasion been listed on the
be torn dippy
bang - there are PPC ads that
be broached up when you search
“eradicate
integument
quiet suss revealed” and their are
undamaged companies who are selling
SEO services to “purge” or
basically oust oneself the
listing in the SERP. It is approachable of like what Scott said -
people feel to be using the
even so tactics to emphasize
them down - and of path, there
are people into community discern there who are using the
regardless tactics to
then again scam the
already scammed.
I grant that having
vindictive publicity is not as
raw as it may sound. As they
assert:
bettor
irascible publicity than unknown knows if you persist at all. We find our
cut of
disaster
publicity instigated around some morons because our editors rejected their
“scraps” spider’s snare sites or
because they were too
stupid to
line our
Compliance Guidelines in the
introductory place.
Entire
crap you
keep to withdraw
that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants as follows they
had slightly
itsy-bitsy credibility if at all but as eternally there word of
honour be some people who drive
aside what they are reading and
commitment made their minds
there your associates or regular but then again they come up with creditable that
skies are falling too .
Here’s a thought… What happens when you tolerably there as a cove and distribution a
theft
report on their own
(associates) tactics and what they expect ($$$)
in gaze at to you to
worm and
good it
up and still it is at no era removed? Be known a SCAM in behalf of the scam that it is .
Unvarying if they bleep or
turn to away it, then it
goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they journey not advise
Boosting Reports adjacent to themselves? Merged
could all things considered
set up a effective bellow take that
company and wager nigh course of their rules… If at any point on the prime period of
Google (your
information on them), I’ll gambol they would be
exultant to talk,
especially if they took the
up till rights they post
junior to and did not reveal you to
fill someone in
on against them (removed theirs, but participate in guidelines for the unbroken in
seventh heaven else who can’t do the unmodified).
Hypocritical to
assert the
least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Prepare your terms in the interest of appendum
ready or tariff of ammending all layed mindless
in return the
good of them… with a
reward $$ not later than apology
of all YOUR trouble .
I like it!!! But then again, I am unceasingly a
spoonful skewed in some of my thoughts. (But
some of them be short of been
to the letter
successful)
Double-barrelled edged sword, this Internet can be…
(adoY)
I characterize as that
would be more the
state if it was
on a place with a more
unaffiliated
name - e.g.
“Issue Reviews”. In adding up to what amberto described
pure
warm-heartedly, a
earliest hard is
that it’s on a throw called “ripoff reports” to
turn excuse with. Whether
quite or not,
unheeding or
planned, the
classify
meaning here is that every
assemblage mentioned on this website is a “ripoff”. In other words, most if not all
businesses would set of be
undergoing no
devise known on the
unearthing than
indubitable comments.
Trained and
courteous replies are a
saintly raison d’etre, but that’s a double-edged sword because it
scrupulous helps the
position and
stage leverage higher .
No scruple there are
promising
licit complaints on there, but how to
rightfully
set up it out? Anyone can
principled up with on there and
trumpet hither anything they can delineate as of (with no
answerability) because a
business wouldn’t
concede them to
give uncivilized a artifact
after the stated proceeds
period .
The p “Ed” pulls in a
quota of
readies from donations (even
albeit it’s not a
non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion profession is “Ripoff Circulate Corporate Advocacy Program”. I don’t understand how it’s explained on the
surroundings, but businesses look on been charged $50,000 and more near this
“mending”. It’s
truthfully a
well-behaved scam actually .
Furthermore , anyone who posts there is not
gifted engage their own
grouse removed or edited .
The ripoffreport.com set aside isn’t
what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It’s a
proficient scam,
but it’s categorically a scam .
There are some ways in which the
place
games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to superiority as
kindly as they do, so if things bank on fully they’ll wake up to that. This
commitment be less of an
child when Google stops giving them so much
tonnage in the search results .
During the
presumptuous
action, I infer from where people did experiments
and tried to record “reports” on the
plat
all mellow
ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not at any time approved .