SEARCH:
Movies
Print Text size Comment
Email this
Stormtrooper battle returns to British courts

The form has errors highlighted in red, please review these entries and try again!



(Separate multiple addresses with commas)




privacy policy | visitor agreement
Enlarge Image
FILE - This is a Tuesday, April 8, 2008 file photo British movie prop designer Andrew Ainsworth, who created the design for the Star Wars' stormtrooper white battle suits, arrives at the Royal Courts of justice in London. The George Lucas empire has struck back against a British prop designer who sold replicas of the iconic Stormtrooper uniforms from the "Star Wars" movies. Designer Andrew Ainsworth has fought a long legal battle against Lucasfilm Ltd., which sued him over the replica suits and helmets he sold through a Web site. (AP Photo/Sang Tan)

More in Movies


Stormtrooper battle returns to British courts



The Associated Press

Tuesday, November 03, 2009

LONDON — The George Lucas empire struck back Tuesday against a British prop designer who sold replicas of the iconic Stormtrooper uniforms from the "Star Wars" movies.

Designer Andrew Ainsworth has fought a long legal battle against Lucasfilm Ltd., which sued him over the replica suits and helmets he sold through a Web site.

Ainsworth sculpted the Stormtrooper helmets for the first "Star Wars" movie in 1977 and later sold replicas of the molded white uniforms, worn in the films by warriors of the evil Galactic Empire.

The case ended ambiguously at London's High Court last year. A judge ruled that Ainsworth had violated Lucas's U.S. copyright, but rejected a copyright claim against him under British law, saying the costumes were not works of art.

The judge also refused to enforce in Britain a US$20 million judgment Lucasfilm won against Ainsworth in a California court in 2006, saying Ainsworth's U.S. sales were not significant enough to make him susceptible to U.S. jurisdiction.

Now lawyers for Lucas want the Court of Appeal to rule that the suits are sculptures and therefore works of art covered by British copyright law.

Michael Bloch, Lucasfilm's lawyer, said the case rested on "the scope and meaning of sculpture" as defined by the law.

Bloch said the judge at the previous hearing "erred in holding that it is an essential requirement of every sculpture that it have artistic character, in that it must have, as part of its purpose, a visual appeal in the sense that it might be enjoyed for that purpose alone."

"On the erroneous approach of the learned judge, arguably the most famous sculpture in the world, Michelangelo's 'Pieta' in St. Peter's Basilica in Rome, would also be disqualified" — because its purpose is primarily religious.

The case isscheduled to last three days.

___

Nov 03, 2009 - 1:17 p.m. EDT

Copyright 2009, The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Your comments

Post a Comment

Comments that include profanity, personal attacks or any other inappropriate material are prohibited. By using our site you agree to our ground rules and our terms of use. There could be a delay of up to 5 minutes before your comment appears.

The form has errors highlighted in red, please review these entries and try again!


INSIDE Look

Frugal Finds
Blog helps consumers

Thrifty shoppers Kelley Kirk and Brooke Banson share tips


TOP CARS
  • Pontiac Grand Am, 1989, 2.3L I4 16V DOHC....(more)
  • Buick Skylark, 1989, 2.5L I4 8V....(more)
  • Ford Aerostar, 1989, 3.0L V6 12V....(more)
- View All Top Cars -
- Place An Ad -

The Daily Reflector | Weather | Sports | Look | Business | Opinion | Classifieds | Site Map
Cars | Jobs | Homes

Copyright 2009 The Daily Reflector All rights reserved. - The Daily Reflector - Our Partners

By using this service, you accept the terms of our visitor agreement and privacy policy. About our ads.
Registered site users, you may edit your profile.
Having trouble? Visit our help & FAQ