East Carolina University, along with the rest of the UNC system, is facing budget reductions that could affect any number of operations.
The newly formed budget task force met with ECU faculty and staff Tuesday night n the Hendrix Theater to gather recommendations on how to operate more efficiently in advance of potential state funding cutbacks.
Faculty members discussed a range of topics with the budget task force from reducing energy costs to salary cuts.
In an effort to find every way possible to reduce costs without cutting positions, Chancellor Steve Ballard formed the task force to make recommendations to the Chancellor’s executive counsel to reduce the budget.
Ballard said Tuesday about 75 percent of budgets in the various university departments go to personnel.
“Budgets are very personnel driven and it allows very little to look at otherwise,” Ballard said.
With state reversions in the current budget year, departments have already been trying to cut costs.
“Every unit has given back significant operating money at this point.
“The units have very little operating money to give back right now,” said Provost Marilyn Sheerer.
Ballard said UNC President Erskine Bowles is working to make sure that any budget cuts to the university system are not recurring so that when the economy picks up ECU and the other universities will not be behind where they were before the current state budget deficit.
“There is a political strategy, if we can get this compromise we will not sacrifice the fabric of our institution,” Ballard said.
The faculty balked at suggestions to increase class sizes and offer fewer courses per semester.
Several members of the faculty said large classes in certain subjects are impossible.
But students may find it harder to get into the classes they need to graduate on time if the faculty is reduced and fewer classes are offered each semester.
These issues are being discussed at every campus in the system. Many schools are facing considerable reductions in faculty based on budget predictions.
Gov. Beverly Perdue asked the UNC system to prepare budgets with 3 percent, 5 percent and 7 percent reductions.
A reduction of 7 percent could mean the loss of millions of dollars in funding to each university across the state and may mean job cuts at some schools.
ECU is trying to avoid cutting any jobs, said ECU spokesman John Durham.
“Looking ahead, we are making every effort to avoid cuts or lay-offs,” Durham said.
“It all depends on how severe the cutbacks are in terms of state appropriations, but we have seen this coming.”
Your comments
sb
02/12/2009 09:42:59 PM
Well, let's think about the fact they are still paying coaches who are no longer at the university. Can we recoup some of that money? It's absolutely ridiculous to pay out that kind of money to "buy out" a contract and continue to pay them when they are employed. What can we do about that to bring back the "monies" to save the faculty and students?
Suggest removalTorquemada
02/12/2009 02:54:01 PM
I like Santa Claus...
Suggest removalECU Faculty
02/12/2009 02:01:58 PM
Basset hounds got long ears.
Suggest removalECUStaff
02/12/2009 09:38:36 AM
I just want to quote JT, because I totally agree with what they said:
Suggest removal"The University and entire UNC System have known (or been fearful of) these cuts for months. To wait until now to worry about a contingency plan is irresponsible and poor business planning by Dr. Ballard."
Let me also add that this could possibly be attributed to their inability to properly control intake of students. More students = more faculty = more salaries, right?
In the know
02/12/2009 09:23:06 AM
Most of you don't seem to understand the dynamics of state mandated budget reductions. The reductions MUST come from state appropriated funds. The fountain and Athletic initiatives are funded by non-state/private funds...apples and oranges.
Suggest removalTo Lynda
02/12/2009 08:42:22 AM
You've hit the nail on the head. Education first - asthetics last.
Suggest removallynda
02/12/2009 08:39:01 AM
i think a better question would be why is it that trustees and private donors want to fund a fountain instead of classes? where are their priorities? thanks for the money... but whats the use of a pretty campus if the education is sub-par
Suggest removalsv
02/12/2009 07:59:18 AM
You are exactly right jtj...people don't understand "money is not money". You can't take private donation dollars and reallocate to help the budget crisis.
Suggest removaljtj
02/11/2009 11:48:33 PM
Once again people think that money is money period. Not the case, money in certain budget line items can't be shifted and used for other things. Funding for the fountain is being contributed by current and former trustees.
Suggest removalJT
02/11/2009 09:15:07 PM
The University and entire UNC System have known (or been fearful of) these cuts for months. To wait until now to worry about a contingency plan is irresponsible and poor business planning by Dr. Ballard. I find it extremely hard to believe that various nonacademic departments throughout the University don't have the funds to assist with this problem as well.
Suggest removalFor example, there's a beautiful new fountain being built. Necessary? Definitely not.
Post a Comment
Comments that include profanity, personal attacks or any other inappropriate material are prohibited. By using our site you agree to our ground rules and our terms of use. There could be a delay of up to 5 minutes before your comment appears.