One way of breaking the nation’s reliance on foreign oil imports and avoiding the potential environmental calamities of offshore drilling is the development of viable transportation alternatives. High-speed rail — often discussed but rarely pursued by government or private investment — represents an attractive option that could make a difference along the densely populated corridors.
In a rare partnership, North Carolina and Virginia are working together to see high-speed rail connect key cities to a common ride, an effort that will be aided by a multimillion dollar federal grant. Their success in this endeavor could not only change the commuting patterns for millions, but also be part of a comprehensive new, more economical and more stable energy policy.
The Southeast High Speed Rail Corridor project began in 2010 with a goal of connecting the railroad-dependent Northeast with faster lines throughout the South. By creating a network that extends from Jacksonville, Fla., to the nation’s capital, it would connect the entire Eastern Seaboard, linking major metropolitan cities like Atlanta, Charlotte and Columbia, S.C., with Philadelphia, New York and Boston.
For the complete article, please pick up a copy of The Daily Reflector. Current home delivery and electronic edition subscribers may log in to access this article at no charge. To become a subscriber, please click here or contact Customer Service at (252) 329-9505.











Comments
freedom
Mathteacher, we have about 3% of the world's oil reserves, even if we opened all our wilderness areas, national parks, off shore sites , etc. We consume about 25% of the world market for oil. So, do the math. It doesn't add up to independence from middle east oil, no matter which wat you cut it. In the interim I,m sure our men and women in uniform wish they had more than one life to give for your "freedom".
A worthy idea, but....
To hope that America would turn toward a European style rail society is unrealistic, these types of changes should have come decades ago, and when America was on a better financial footing. It might have possibly worked in tandem with Eisenhower's push toward interstate highways, or thereafter, but reducing America's love for automobiles nowadays would require social engineering of the highest order.
Risk vs reward vs investment
Although high speed rail is good in theory, I'm afraid that to make America a rail society would take major if not catastrophic shifts to make it cost effective, like in the cost of petroleum. And the $48 million mentioned in Federal funds to finance a high speed rail system between Raleigh and Washington DC sounds like a drop in the bucket, think Big Dig types of cost overruns.
Stop!
You environmental kooks keep leading this great nation down a rat hole by ther nose through the Democrat party. I don't expect people with your ideology to understand that it is the car that made our country great and strong. The reason private investers haven't financed high speed rail is because they know it won't make money. After someone arrives by train, they still need a car to get to their final destination. Real Americans want the freedom that comes from having a car. The real answer to become independant from foreign oil is to drill here.
Add comment
Speed Up Your Internet for Free. Try Internet Turbo - Download Now!
Internet-Turbo.com?-Free-Downoad-
High Speed Internet Deals
Tips To Cut Your High Speed Internet Bill In Half With These Providers.
TheTipsRegistry.com
Don't Buy Broadband
Before Comparing High Speed Internet Providers. Best Broadband Deals.
ISP1.us/High-Speed
Speed Test
Test real speed of your internet connection easily.
www.checkmyipaddress.org