63°

Tonight
65°

Tomorrow
86°/65°

facebook Icon
rss Icon
twitter Icon

Web Search powered by
YAHOO! SEARCH

FILE - This Wednesday, April 21, 2010 file photo shows oil in the Gulf of Mexico, more than 50 miles southeast of Venice on Louisiana's tip, as a large plume of smoke rises from fires on BP's Deepwater Horizon offshore oil rig. An April 20, 2010 explosion at the offshore platform killed 11 men, and the subsequent leak released an estimated 172 million gallons of petroleum into the gulf. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, File)

Gerald Herbert

FILE - This Wednesday, April 21, 2010 file photo shows oil in the Gulf of Mexico, more than 50 miles southeast of Venice on Louisiana's tip, as a large plume of smoke rises from fires on BP's Deepwater Horizon offshore oil rig. An April 20, 2010 explosion at the offshore platform killed 11 men, and the subsequent leak released an estimated 172 million gallons of petroleum into the gulf. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, File)

Editorial: Protecting coastline should be priority

3 Comments | Leave a Comment


It was with unintended comedy that three Republican members of the state Senate would hold a press conference calling for offshore drilling in North Carolina on the first anniversary of the BP oil catastrophe. N.C. Sen. Bob Rucho of Mecklenburg County said the timing was ironic, though “tone deaf” may have been a more apt description.

The Gulf states are still reeling from an environmental disaster that showed oil companies capable of drilling holes in the ocean floor lack the skills and equipment needed should things go wrong. That is why a majority of the state opposes a similar risk along the North Carolina coast and why any effort to open the state to drilling should be fiercely resisted.

Residents along the Gulf of Mexico coastline held rallies and candlelight vigils on Wednesday to mark the one-year anniversary of an explosion on the Deepwater Horizon drilling platform that killed 11 people and injured 16 more. Some 4.9 million barrels of crude were released into the water before the well was capped nearly three months later, killing countless wildlife, contaminating fish stocks and devastating coastal communities in the nation's worst environmental catastrophe since the Dust Bowl.

For the complete article, please pick up a copy of The Daily Reflector or purchase today’s electronic edition at http://www.reflector.com/circ-store. Current home delivery and electronic edition subscribers may log in to access this article at no charge. To become a subscriber, please click here or contact Customer Service at (252) 329-9505.

Comments

30 years too late

The gas crises of the 1970s should have jarred us out of our complacent coma, and in the name of national security we should have applied a full court press toward clean renewable energy technologies, including incentivizing the auto industry into weaning this country on its dependence on fossil fuels. With computer technology making leaps and bounds these days, a commensurate progress could have been made in weaning ourselves from the combustion engine. Instead, our short sighted energy policies since Reagan based in greed have done just the opposite.

Out of Touch

Tone deaf? How about, completely out of touch with reality? We who live here do not need offshore drilling. These guys are just doing the bidding of the big oil companies.

The Gulf Oil Spill

The oil spill was supposed to be Armageddon. There was even fear this crack in the earths floor was so vast and deep it would never close and perhaps keep expanding. All the while numerous towns on the Gulf Coast were trying in vain to get the word out that there actually was no oil on their beaches and people should not cancel their vacation plans. No chance there - it didn't fit the narrative. Remember the tar balls washing up in Florida? Remember the disappointment when it wasn't from the Gulf? I was actually surprised that truth got out. I'm not sure that would happen in the future.

To be liberal is to believe that technology can, sooner than later, solve any problem, including concentrating such a diffuse energy source as solar into powerful forms, or turning wind power into a continuous power source; but never, ever could technology solve the problems incurred with oil spills or nuclear incidents. Nor could technology address the carbon emissions from coal that keep making the winters colder and the summers hotter, or vice-versa.

The current administration has absolutely no desire to see oil prices decline, and with their monetary practices coupled with their attitude toward oil exploration, they are doing their best to assure it doesn't happen. So, we'll see $5, then $6 gas then beyond. The cost of food production will rise commensurately. This represents a rugged, nasty future. At the moment, there is no choice. Come 2012, we can hope for change we can believe in.

Add comment

Login or register to post comments
Sponsored Links
Options Made Easy
Trade Options with 75-81% Returns
www.nystockoptions.com

Today's Top MMA Rates
Browse Top 25 Money Market Rates. Sort by APY,Reviews, Banks.
www.Bankaholic.com

Woman is 51 But Looks 25
Mom cut 20 years in a week by using this 1 weird trick...
ConsumerLifestyles.org

53yr Old Woman, Looks 25
Mom reveals simple wrinkle trick that has angered doctors...
www.ConsumerLifestyleMag.com