61°

Tonight
65°

Tomorrow
86°/65°

SPECIAL WEATHER STATEMENT
facebook Icon
rss Icon
twitter Icon

Web Search powered by
YAHOO! SEARCH

Letter: Gingrich, Obama each fail on jobs

4 Comments | Leave a Comment


Howard Moye’s Jan. 26 letter in support of former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich was disappointing. He complains, as do I, about the exporting of American jobs overseas, then ignores Gingrich’s record on the issue. In 1993, Gingrich voted for free trade with Mexico and Canada. In 1994, he voted to create the World Trade Organization. And in 1998, he voted for most favored trade status with China. Both he and former President Bill Clinton destroyed the positives of Reaganomics. Tax breaks to millionaire investors now go to create jobs in Mexico and China, not the United States.

President Barack Obama has done no better. He has signed and bragged about new free trade agreements with North Korea, Panama and Columbia. Both Gingrich and Obama claim U.S. labor can compete with anyone in the world on a fair playing field. True, but the playing field is not fair. American labor costs $34.74 an hour, Mexico $6.23, North Korea at $16.62 and China about $2. On this issue, both Obama and Gingrich are in agreement.

Further disappointment comes from accusations that Obama is ushering in some Marxist/Socialist regime. Asking the mega-rich to pay 30 percent to balance the budget is far less than many presidents have asked including Reagan, Richard Nixon, John Kennedy and Dwight Eisenhower. Obama’s proposed military cuts are not so different than President George Bush’s cuts after the Soviet collapse. Were those presidents Marxist?

For the complete article, please pick up a copy of The Daily Reflector or purchase today’s electronic edition at http://www.reflector.com/circ-store. Current home delivery and electronic edition subscribers may log in to access this article at no charge. To become a subscriber, please click here or contact Customer Service at (252) 329-9505.

Comments

For now we reap the tax policies of greed & wealth consolidation

As one of those independent moderates, I'm sick of both parties and their self-serving policies of incumbency at all costs, and both parties feed at the same big money banquet. We are reaping the whirlwind of the tax-cut mania under one party Republican rule, whose tax policies tilted the scales toward wealth rather than producing anything such as jobs or products.

Great response

sc9484 is right! Obama wants to raise capital gains or investment taxes to 30%, which will affect ALL investors, not just millionaires. Investing in publicly traded, American companies should be incentivized, not de-incentivized. Mitt Romney is a moderate Republican with the tools necessary to bring both parties together to get the job done.

Our outdated tax code means

Our outdated tax code means that a rich person can find enough loopholes to pay little tax. Obama can raise the rates but until the millions of loopholes and dodges are corrected then tax revenue will not increase much. Best thing to do is have all payroll go directly to the government. The Obama could take what he needed and return to the worker what Obama thinks they need.

Tax rate

The rich you speak of already pay a 35% tax rate. The lower rates (15%) apply only to investments. Obama is assuming, correctly, that most people do not know the differance. And I am sure the percentage of people in this income range would appreciate a 5% reduction in taxes.

Add comment

Login or register to post comments
Sponsored Links
53-Year-Old Mom Looks 27
Follow this 1 weird tip and remove 20 years of wrinkles in 21 days.
SmartConsumerMagazine.com

53yr Old Woman, Looks 25
Mom reveals simple wrinkle trick that has angered doctors...
www.ConsumerLifestyleMag.com

bad credit
A New Credit Card Is How You Rebuild Your Bad Credit! Start Now.
Mycredittree.com

New York Stock Options
Options Made Easy on our New Advanced Trading Platform
www.nystockoptions.com