Voters may not have come to polling stations in droves on Tuesday for Pitt County's municipal election, but the ballots cast confirmed most of the status quo throughout the community. Change was marked with two new faces coming to the Greenville City Council, among other races in which voters looked to infuse government with new ideas.
The victorious candidates should head to office in the coming weeks with memories of their election battles, remembering the pledges made on the campaign trail and the thoughtful ideas offered by their opponents. That will ensure that this process was both productive and substantive, which ultimately serves the public's best interest.
A sunny Election Day greeted Pitt County voters on Tuesday as polls opened for this year's municipal election. And though turnout numbers seem to have matched low expectations, the outcomes that emerged will result in few changes to the landscape over the coming years.
Though the vote totals have yet to be confirmed by election officials, it appears that mayors in most towns were re-elected to new terms in office, including Winterville Mayor Doug Jackson, who survived a spirited three-way contest. In Greenville, voters sided with most incumbents, with Mayor Pat Dunn and Council members Bryant Kittrell and Calvin Mercer defeating their opponents.
Councilman Larry Spell's decision to decline a re-election bid ensured at least one new face on the City Council, and it was Marion Blackburn who received more votes in District 3. And the tightest race of the night, that in District 1, saw challenger Kandie Smith defeat 11-term incumbent Councilwoman Mildred Council by a mere 12 votes, though election officials still must review the results.
Municipal elections in Pitt County are routinely plagued with problems like low-voter turnout and general disinterest. Perhaps that is due to the timing of the vote in off years or the lack of a high-profile race at the top of the ballot that motivates residents to participate.
However, voters should never take these elections for granted, especially when considering their importance to the everyday tasks of local government. So many public services that have an immediate, tangible impact on citizens' lives originate at the local level, and that emphasizes the importance of citizen participation in elections.
Those who put themselves before voters deserve the utmost respect and gratitude of this community, because leading a campaign is a tiresome task without assurance of results. Even though voter participation lagged, Pitt County can now look to implementing solutions to persistent problems, returning its focus on the future.
Your comments
Citizen
11/08/2009 04:53:23 PM
People shouldn't be chosen because of color. They should be chosen because they are the best candidate for the job. The city needs to go back to letting the entire city vote for all districts.
Suggest removalterry
11/05/2009 03:12:57 PM
district representation doesn't include
Suggest removalexcluding people from serving from their district- This method of voting doesn't preclude minorities - it just fosters more city voting and less, not more, discrimination. The continued racial disharmony in this city is real and this method of voting drives this discrimination
This voting method perpetrates discrimination( on both sides) - it hasn't stopped it, by far, in Greenville- see council meetings with Glover and Craft a few years ago...
Remember when
11/05/2009 02:06:24 PM
Greenville went to the district representation to assure minorities seats on the council many years ago. White men took most of the spots except for Ed Carter who was a good mayor.
Suggest removaljack
11/05/2009 01:09:34 PM
terry is correct
Suggest removalmany cities do it the way he suggests
And it will stop this "our side of town"
mentality as the candidates will have to
court all voters - not just those in their district- there may be less racial strife on the council if the whole city gets to pick each district's representative
terry1
11/05/2009 11:03:25 AM
We have a structural problem with the way the district representatives are elected, yet I have seen nobody address it.
Suggest removalIn many municipalities, the candidates must come from the district they represent but all city citizens vote for each district candidates. Greenville
only allows citizens to vote for the district representative in their district.
This is a poor system as the district representative performs functions for all districts.
terry 2
11/05/2009 11:00:15 AM
Thus Greenville citizens are really not in a demoncracy as they only get to vote for two of the five representatives. If you want a better citizen turn-out modify the voting so that the whole city decides who their representative from each district should be- not just those in that district.
Suggest removalIt just makes more sense- Ayden does it the right way.
low participation
11/05/2009 10:01:55 AM
it is difficult to get enthusiastic about
Suggest removalgoing to the polls when the choices are so poor.I agree with "no real choice" and your editorial is good. I keep praying for qualify candidates at every local election and I always get disappointed so I vote for the lesser evil and hope for the best.
No real choice
11/05/2009 08:52:08 AM
Most voters want educated, knowledgeble and experienced people to serve in elected office. Until each race has more choices of such people voter turnout will continue to reflect the apathy felt.
Suggest removalPost a Comment
Comments that include profanity, personal attacks or any other inappropriate material are prohibited. By using our site you agree to our ground rules and our terms of use. There could be a delay of up to 5 minutes before your comment appears.